Thursday, August 5, 2021

Does Animal sacrifice and meat consumption are allowed in Hinduism ?

 


If you also have the

same question that

animal sacrifice and

meat consumption

is acceptable by

Hinduism ? Then

you must read this

post ...


The answer is Big No

Still confused?

Yes some hindu scriptures

accepts Animal sacrifice or

meat consumption, but this

is Myths

Why Myths?

Because the all ref. who's

accept animal sacrifice

and meat consumption is

interpolation


Let's see what Manusmriti says

рдпा рд╡ेрджрдмाрд╣्рдпाः рд╕्рдоृрддрдпो рдпाрд╢्рдЪ рдХाрд╢्рдЪ рдХुрджृрд╖्рдЯрдпः ।

рд╕рд░्рд╡ाрд╕्рддा рдиिрд╖्рдлрд▓ाः рдк्рд░ेрдд्рдп рддрдоोрдиिрд╖्рдаा рд╣ि рддाः рд╕्рдоृрддाः ||12. 95 ॥

translation :- Those 'revealed texts' that

are outside the Veda, as also all the

false theories, are useless, even when

carried to perfection; as they have been

declared to be founded on 'darkness

So Manusmriti said scriptures that

opposing vedas are false . And

Vedas never accepted any animal

sacrifice or meat consumption. so it

is clear that scriptures contain

animal sacrifice and meat

consumption are interpolation.


Now let's see what our scriptures says

about animal sacrifice and meat

consumption.


Manusmriti


рдиाрдХृрдд्рд╡ा рдк्рд░ाрдгिрдиां рд╣िंрд╕ां рдоांрд╕рдоुрдд्рдкрдж्рдпрддे рдХ्рд╡ рдЪिрдд् ।

рди рдЪ рдк्рд░ाрдгिрд╡рдзः рд╕्рд╡рд░्рдЧ्рдпрд╕्рддрд╕्рдоाрди् рдоांрд╕ं рд╡िрд╡рд░्рдЬрдпेрдд् ॥ 5.48 ॥

Meat is never obtained without having

encompassed the killing of animals; and

the killing of animals does not lead to

heaven; hence everyone should avoid meat.


рд╕рдоुрдд्рдкрдд्рддिं рдЪ рдоांрд╕рд╕्рдп рд╡рдзрдмрди्рдзौ рдЪ рджेрд╣िрдиाрдо् ।

рдк्рд░рд╕рдоीрдХ्рд╖्рдп рдиिрд╡рд░्рддेрдд рд╕рд░्рд╡рдоांрд╕рд╕्рдп рднрдХ्рд╖рдгाрдд् || 5.49 ||

Having duly pondered over the origin of

meat, and over the fettering and killing

of living beings, everyone should

abstain from the eating of all meat


рдпो рдмрди्рдзрдирд╡рдзрдХ्рд▓ेрд╢ाрди् рдк्рд░ाрдгिрдиां рди рдЪिрдХीрд░्рд╖рддि ।

рд╕ рд╕рд░्рд╡рд╕्рдп рд╣िрддрдк्рд░ेрдк्рд╕ुः рд╕ुрдЦрдордд्рдпрди्рддрдорд╢्рдиुрддे ।। 5.46 ||

He, who does not seek to inflict

sufferings of capture and death on

living beings, is the well-wisher of

all and obtains perfect happiness.


рдпोрд╜рд╣िंрд╕рдХाрдиि рднूрддाрдиि рд╣िрдирд╕्рдд्рдпाрдд्рдорд╕ुрдЦैрдЪ्рдЫрдпा ।

рд╕ рдЬीрд╡ांрд╢्рдЪ рдоृрддрд╢्рдЪैрд╡ рди рдХ्рд╡ рдЪिрдд् рд╕ुрдЦрдоेрдзрддे ।। 5.45 ||

He, who kills harmless creatures for

the sake of his own pleasure, never

attains happiness, living or head


рди рднрдХ्рд╖рдпрддि рдпो рдоांрд╕ं рд╡िрдзिं рд╣िрдд्рд╡ा рдкिрд╢ाрдЪрд╡рдд् ।

рди рд▓ोрдХे рдк्рд░िрдпрддां рдпाрддि рд╡्рдпाрдзिрднिрд╢्рдЪ рди рдкीрдб्рдпрддे ।। 5.50 ।।

He who does not eat meat like a fiend,

disregarding the proper method, becomes

popular among men and is not afflicted by

disease


рдЕрдиुрдорди्рддा рд╡िрд╢рд╕िрддा рдиिрд╣рди्рддा рдХ्рд░рдпрд╡िрдХ्рд░рдпी।

рд╕ंрд╕्рдХрд░्рддा рдЪोрдкрд╣рд░्рддा рдЪ рдЦाрджрдХрд╢्рдЪेрддि рдШाрддрдХाः || релрез ।।

He who approves, he who cuts, he who

kills, he who buys and sells, he who

cooks, he who serves and he who eats it

are 'slayers'


рд╕्рд╡рдоांрд╕ं рдкрд░рдоांрд╕ेрди рдпो рд╡рд░्рдзрдпिрддुрдоिрдЪ्рдЫрддि ।

рдЕрдирдн्рдпрд░्рдЪ्рдп рдкिрддॄрди् рджेрд╡ांрд╕्рддрддोрд╜рди्рдпो рдиाрд╕्рдд्рдпрдкुрдг्рдпрдХृрдд् ॥ 5.52 ।।

If a man, without worshipping the gods

and Pit┼┐s, seeks to increase his own

flesh by the flesh of others, there is no

s inner greater than that person.


рдоां рд╕ рднрдХ्рд╖рдпिрддाрд╜рдоुрдд्рд░ рдпрд╕्рдп рдоांрд╕рдоिрд╣ाрдж् рдо्рдпрд╣рдо् ।

рдПрддрдд्рдоांрд╕рд╕्рдп рдоांрд╕рдд्рд╡ं рдк्рд░рд╡рджрди्рддि рдордиीрд╖िрдгः ॥ 5.55 ॥

Me he (m─Бm-sa) will devour in the next

world, whose meat I eat in this'—this is

the 'meatness' (m─Бmsatva) of the 'meat

(m─Бmsa), as the wise ones declare.


Atharva-veda


let's our teeth eat

rise, beans, sesame but not anything which is

capable of being father & mother (We must

note that even animals are capable of being

father & mother).

(6.140.2 )


that noble souls are

those who protect all animals

& also prays that our behavior does not afflict

any animal.

( 19.48.5 )


Yajur-veda


Yajurved 1.1 - is a long verse

but the last

sentence of the verse says to

protect animals.


Yajurved 12.32 - says, May you

not kill any

creature by your body.


Bhagavad Mahapuran


рд╣рди्рдпрди्рддे рдкрд╢рд╡ो рдпрдд्рд░ рдиिрд░्рджрдпैрд░рдЬिрддाрдд्рдорднिः ।

рдорди्рдпрдоाрдиैрд░िрдоं рджेрд╣рдордЬрд░ाрдоृрдд्рдпु рдирд╢्рд╡рд░рдо् (10.10.9)

Unable to control their senses, rascals who are falsely

proud of their riches or their birth in aristocratic families are

so cruel that to maintain their perishable bodies, which they

think will never grow old or die, they kill poor animals

without mercy. Sometimes they kill animals merely to enjoy

an excursion.


Markandey Puran


"Compassion

towards all Creatures", "directed towards

welfare of all creatures" are the qualities of

sinless men.

(15.43-45)


Mahabharata


says that

foolish meat eaters will not be able to enjoy the

pleasure of heaven because they will never

attain it.

(Anushasan Parv 114.15)


Bramhand Puran


says that it is

evil to cause injury to animals in Yajna. It is

Adharma (sin). No violence should be in

involved in Yajna.

(1.2.30.17-21)


Vishnu Puran


says a beautiful thing, it says, "Those who do

violence against others, they do it against Lord

Vi┼Яnu as he is present in all beings."

(3.8.10)


Bhagavad-gita


There are many references is clearly says

Ahimsa (Non violance) is our Dharm. but

due to space I have given only Two

References.


рджेрд╡рдж्рд╡िрдЬрдЧुрд░ुрдк्рд░ाрдЬ्рдЮрдкूрдЬрдиं рд╢ौрдЪрдоाрд░्рдЬрд╡рдо् ।

рдм्рд░рд╣्рдордЪрд░्рдпрдорд╣िंрд╕ा рдЪ рд╢ाрд░ीрд░ं рддрдк рдЙрдЪ्рдпрддे

Austerity of the body consists in worship of the

Supreme Lord, the br─Бhmaс╣Зas, the spiritual master,

and superiors like the father and mother, and in

cleanliness, simplicity, celibacy and nonviolence.

(17.14)


рдЕрд╣िंрд╕ा рд╕рдд्рдпрдордХ्рд░ोрдзрд╕्рдд्рдпाрдЧ: рд╢ाрди्рддिрд░рдкैрд╢ुрдирдо् |

рджрдпा рднूрддेрд╖्рд╡рд▓ोрд▓ुрдк्рдд्рд╡ं рдоाрд░्рджрд╡ं рд╣्рд░ीрд░рдЪाрдкрд▓рдо्

Non-violence, truthfulness, absence of anger,

renunciation, control of the internal organ, absence of

vilification, kindness to creatures, non-covetousness,

gentleness, modesty, freedom from restlessness;

(16.2)


Bhagavad Mahapuran


рдпे рдд्рд╡рдиेрд╡ंрд╡िрджोрд╜рд╕рди्рдд: рд╕्рддрдм्рдзा: рд╕рджрднिрдоाрдиिрдиः ।

рдкрд╢ूрди् рдж्рд░ुрд╣्рдпрди्рддि рд╡िрд╢्рд░рдм्рдзा: рдк्рд░ेрдд्рдп рдЦाрджрди्рддि рддे рдЪ рддाрди्

Those sinful persons who are ignorant of actual religious

principles, yet consider themselves to be completely pious,

without compunction commit violence against innocent

animals who are fully trusting in them. In their next lives, such

sinful persons will be eaten by the same creatures they have

killed in this world.

(11.5.14)


Mahabharata


рд╕ुрд░ाрдордд्рд╕्рдпा рдордзुрдоांрд╕рдоाрд╕рд╡ं рдХृрд╕рд░ौрджрдирдо्।

рдзूрд░्рддेः рдк्рд░рд╡рд░्рддिрддं рд╣ोрддрди्рдиैрддрдж् рд╡ेрджेрд╖ु рдХрд▓्рдкिрддрдо्।।

wine, fish, animal flesh, biracial

Sacrifice etc. was initiated into the Yagya by the rascals; Vedas

There is no such legislation in this. Well, Medha's

any rational urge to make violent connotations

should

not. sacrificial process

It is proper to keep it free from this stigma.

(Shanti parv 265.9)


Mahabharata


"He who treats animals for sacrifice,

who sells them, who buys them, who kills them,

who serves their food and who makes them his food,

All are equally sinners"

(Anushashan parv 115.45)


Bhagavad Mahapuran


рдпрдж् рдШ्рд░ाрдгрднрдХ्рд╖ो рд╡िрд╣िрдд: рд╕ुрд░ाрдпा-

рд╕्рддрдеा рдкрд╢ोрд░ाрд▓рднрдиं рди рд╣िंрд╕ा ।

In Vedic sacrifice (Yagya) ,their is no need to

sacrifice animals, it is only allow to use animals

for special vedic sacrificing work but should not

use animals as sacrificing purpose.

(11.5.13)


So, it is proved that Hinduism

does not accept animal

sacrifice and meat

consumption.

I have given sufficient

references from

different-different religious text

of hinduism. I can't give you

the all references due to time

issue.













Wednesday, June 9, 2021

Did Bhagwan Shri Krishna really said in bhagvadgita that womens are papyoni ? Fact check



jay Shri Krishna

Claim :-
 In bhagvadgita shri krishna said womens are sinner.

Fact :- 

Above claim has world's biggest Myth.

 Mostly the trend has been promoting that bhagwan shri krishna was said that womens are papyoni.

Mostly non Hindu's and Atheist are claiming that shri krishna said in bhagvadgita womens are papi .

They are showing bhagvadgita shlok 32 of chapter 9.

Let's check the shlok (Bhagvadgita 9:32)

рдоां рд╣ि рдкाрд░्рде рд╡्рдпрдкाрд╢्рд░िрдд्рдп рдпेрд╜рдкि рд╕्рдпु: рдкाрдкрдпोрдирдп: 

|рд╕्рдд्рд░िрдпो рд╡ैрд╢्рдпाрд╕्рддрдеा рд╢ूрдж्рд░ाрд╕्рддेрд╜рдкि рдпाрди्рддि рдкрд░ां рдЧрддिрдо् || 9:32||

Meaning :-  O Arjuna! Women, Vaishyas, Shudras and sinners, whosoever they may be, by taking refuge in Me, they attain the supreme state.

Above translation from Gita press. And this translation is genuine. It's may be other versions of bhagvadgita are may be different from Gita press because of there own statement on the shloka. 

Now let's see ISKCON commentary on bhagvadgita 9:32

If whosever taking refuse in me surely they attain supreme state , no matter if they are sinners, womens, vaishyas, shudras. 

Let's see I showing you both Gitapress and Iskcon translation of bhagvadgita. Where they are showing womens are sinners?

They non Hindu's and Atheists are doing misconception of this Verse.

They are showing womens are sinner written in this shlok.

But the fact is shloka translation never says womens are sinner

Otherhand the shloka says vaishya, Sudra, Womens and sinners can also attain to supreme stage.

Here in this shloka did not say womens are sinners.  The shloka never says women and sinners are same.

If you read shloka carefully then you may see that papyoni and womens are different even you should read Sanskrit text only.

The sinners are different , womens are different, vaishya are different, Sudras are different.

We can conclude that 

- women is type of gender

-papyoni is the type of yoni

-vaishya and Sudras are type of varn.

It's a common sense that all types are different. Then how atheists and non Hindus are claiming that Womens are papyoni. All humans (men's and women's) are included in karmyoni.

Womens never include as papyoni.

Womens are different and papyoni different.

Papyoni includes Asur, rakshash, pret, bhoot, pishach, non-humans.  

Womens, men's I mean all humans are included in karmyoni not in papyoni, there is no matter that he/she is bramhan, kshatriya, vaishya, shudra. 

And last one Shri Krishna trying to say that asura ,bhoot, pret, pichach, non-humans who's including in papyoni also attain supreme stage.

Before blaming to our culture I advise to you please think logically. 

Friday, May 14, 2021

Allopanishad : Genuine or not ?

Be aware from allopanishad 
The 60-70% hindu peoples don't know about allopanishad.

 *Did you know what is allopanishad?
 Many foolish hindu peoples beleives that allopanishad is the one of the upnishad among the all upnisheds. But , the truth is the allopanishad is the *fake* upnishad scripture. This allopanishad is not official upnishad. We all knows the truth that is our hindu scriptures are interpolated by Mughals and British. but this allopanishad is not interpolated rather than the whole allopanishad is totally fake. 

*What is allopanishad?*
 Allah + upnishad = allopanishad This allopanishad was wrote during akbar emperor. The scripture wrote by Brahmans who's was forced converted to Islam. Akbar ordered to converted bramhans to write allopanishad for mission convert hindu people's to Islam. Allopanishad refers to allah is the only supreme god .This book was then fraudulently inserted in genuine copies of Atharva Veda. It also had a chapter proclaiming the supremacy of Allah and the religion of Islam over polytheism. Akbar want to hindu peoples in Islam by doing this , he wants to show connection between allah and Hinduism for convert. 

 *How to know allopanishad is fake upnishad ?*
 - First upon the allopanishad promots allah is only god .
 - The Sanskrit writing format doesn't match to other upnished or any othe scriptures like vedas, purana's, bhagvadgita. 
 - Allopanishad have contains most arabic words which are neither be originated from Sanskrit nor be any other Indian languages.
 - Hinduism beleives only 108 upnishad which are genuine. But the name of allopanishad never seen in among all 108 upnishads. 
 - Allopanishad states that allopanishad is the upnished of Athrava Veda but there is no any such kind of allopanishad mentioned in Athrava Veda. 
 - allopanishad contains Mixtures of Sanskrit+ Arabic words such as in the 1st shloka varun, divya and mitra are Sanskrit words and the other hand рдЕрд╕्рдорд▓्рд▓ाрдЗрд▓्рд▓े and рдЗрд▓्рд▓े are arabic terms. 
- Allopanishad states that allah is the only supreme god but our all other scriptures like veda, purana's, bhagvadgita states that bhagwan brahma, bhagwan vishnu, bhagwan shiv are only supreme god . It's seems like allopanishad is opposite to other Hindu scriptures. And Manusmriti mentioned that scriptures opposing vedas are false.
 - akbar ,allah, Muhammad Islamist name also we can clearly see in this nonsense scripture.
 - for more information you can get information from internet. 
 - See this attached picture of allopnishad. 
Thus, it is proved allah upnished / allopanishad is not genuine upnished of hinduism. Be aware about this . 
 Thank you ~

Tuesday, October 6, 2020

Sanatan whatsapp group

 

SANATAN scipture

ЁЯСЙhttps://chat.whatsapp.com/CUsBvAbxYTv2D1IcaFdOwI


Join our group by above link. 


Wednesday, April 22, 2020

JOIN US

WELCOME Here is the joining link....for join our foundationclick here

JOIN FOUNDATION



Process of joining
1] Click on above link

2] Sign in with your GMAIL account

3] Fill the form and submit it